Tuesday, January 29, 2008

Mobile Advertisement to unleash "huge revolution", says Google CEO [with predictions of mobile adverstising revenues]

Source : http://www.telecomtiger.com/fullstory.aspx?passfrom=vasstory&storyid=530
Technologies:
Google chief is bullish on mobile advertisement. He told a panel at the World Economic Forum in Davos that the a new generation of location-based advertising is set to unleash a "huge revolution".

"It'''s the recreation of the Internet, it's the recreation of the PC (personal computer) story and it is before us -- and it is very likely it will happen in the next year," said Google Inc CEO Eric Schmidt.

Forrester, a consultancy firm, has predicted revenues of under $1 billion for mobile advertisements by 2012. Schmidt, however, said this figure was too low and failed to take into account the fact the mobile Web was reaching a tipping point.

Google is one of the bidders for 700 MHz Spectrum auction in the USA.

Analysts have different opinion on the future of mobile advertising. Sterling Market Intelligence forecast mobile advertising revenues will reach $5.08 billion in North America and Western Europe by 2012. Thomson Financial predict Google's 2009 mobile ad revenue alone will reach $21.31 billion. Gartner predict that the worldwide mobile advertising market will grow from $895 million in 2007 to $14.6 billion in 2011, while the Kelsey Group forecast that the US mobile ad market will grow from $33.2 million to $1.4 billion in 2012. Forrester are the most conservative, predicting less than $1 billion in mobile ad revenue by 2012.

In a recent survey by Advertiser Perceptions in the USA, about 55 percent of marketers said that they plan to increase their budgets on mobile spending in the next 6 months, indicating that there is a healthy level of enthusiasm in the market.

However, less than half the participants in the survey, consider 'interactivity', which is a strength of mobile advertising, to be an important criterion when deciding their budgets for advertising. On the other hand, these advertisers consider 'reach', which is a weak point of mobile advertising, to be the number one criteria.

Mobile Internet usage needs to increase and attain levels comparable to other forms of media before platforms and publishers can expect advertisers to invest substantial sums in this medium

You Tube on Symbian Phones

You can find the mobile version of YouTube from Google here. It is a java based application, that has targeted Symbian first;]



Two different ways to watch!



Go to m.youtube.com on your phone
Download the app (beta)*

*Available for Nokia's N73, N95, E65, 6110, 6120 and SonyEricsson k800 and w880.

Could Motorola Fall Off the Mobile Map?

Source: http://www.cellular-news.com/story/28854_2.php

It may not be a question that many in the industry are asking themselves yet, or at least not out loud, but each poor set of results increases the possibility that Motorola could follow Siemens out of the back door of the mobile phone industry. IMS Research says that whilst it yet remains unlikely that anything so drastic might occur, the latest results from Motorola's Mobile Devices unit did little to inspire.
The headlines showed year on year handset sales down 38%, causing profits to fall 84% and losses of $388m as shares fell a further 16%. However, is Motorola simply recovering from the blunting of the RAZR? Its handsets have not always been well received in some parts of the world, all this changed with the RAZR. A phone that, through style and design, gave the average consumer exactly what they wanted; a slim, attractive phone for calls and texting.

Unfortunately this phenomenal but narrow success massively raised expectations that, as we are witnessing, are not easily fulfilled. Instead of delivering a range of ideas, technologies and form factors Motorola continued to follow the same formula by searching for the next big hit. A case of "the RAZR was big, so let's release the RAZR2." Perhaps it comes from a corporate culture infected by the fear factor. Rather than systematically platform-building in new areas, Motorola seems to have tried a bit of this and a bit of that as it looked for the next rabbit to pull from out its hat.
The situation is not helped by some activist groups in its ranks of investors. Drawn in by the excellent results of a few years ago, they did not seem to mind that Motorola had not traditionally accounted for more than 20% of the mobile phone market. Was it that, temporarily at least, it was excelling itself and punching above its weight?

Nor has the quick reaction of the competition helped. Whilst being a little slow to the table with 3G devices, and missing the boat for clamshell and thin designs, Nokia went about strengthening these areas of its portfolio. Samsung was quick to produce a number of thin phones, LG has been moving into higher-end fashion phones whilst Sony Ericsson has been expanding its lower range - all impacting Motorola's success. Combined, these companies have dulled Motorola's edge and now some investors are looking at how to get their money back.
It may be right that more capital could be generated by splitting up Motorola into separate business units. This would free up those successful areas, such as Home & Networks and Enterprise Mobility, from the troubled handsets group; but this is unlikely to be good news for the latter. Siemens went down this road with BenQ not too long ago and we know what happened there. Again I would expect that one or more of the Asian manufacturers would feel that they could build on the Motorola brand and presence, but would they give it the time and strategy to overcome its inherent problems? Additionally I feel that market pressure, should it go it alone, would inhibit the Mobile Devices unit and continue to pressure it to simply cut costs, at the expense of long term strategy.

Motorola seems to be heading in the right direction with the release of attractive music phones, fresh new designs and multimedia-focused products to accompany its staple lower cost and RAZR-based handsets. The announcement to return to Qualcomm as a 3G chip supplier may help as well. Once Motorola progresses in these different segments I expect that, whilst maybe not taking large chunks of market share, it will sharpen up to increase profitability, thereby guaranteeing its continued place in the market.

Tuesday, January 22, 2008

Phone with fold-away screen launched

http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSL2063412420080121?sp=true


The 5-inch (13-cm) display of Polymer Vision's "Readius" is the world's first that folds out when the user wants to read news, blogs or email and folds back together so that the device can fit into a pocket.
Polymer Vision, spun out of Philips (PHG.AS: Quote, Profile, Research), whetted the appetite of gadget fans more than two years ago when it showed off a prototype. Now the gadget is in production and will go head-to-head with Apple's (AAPL.O: Quote, Profile, Research) iPhone and Amazon's (AMZN.O: Quote, Profile, Research) ebook reader Kindle when it hits stores mid-2008.
"You get the large display of e-reading, the super battery life of e-reading, and the high-end connectivity ... and the form factor and weight of a mobile phone," said Karl McGoldrick, chief executive of the venture capital-funded firm, in which Philips still has a 25 percent stake.
"We are taking e-reading and bringing it to the mobile phone."
He would not say how much the Readius would cost, but said it would be comparable to a high-end mobile phone.
McGoldrick said his "dream device", which the company planned to build within 5 years, was a mobile phone with an 8-inch color display that could show video.
Like Amazon's Kindle, the Readius has a so-called electronic paper screen, which displays black-and-white text and images that look almost like they have been printed on paper.
The device -- which will also just make phone calls -- connects to the Internet using the third-generation mobile phone networks with high data speeds.
The company said it was talking to retailers as well as mobile operators to sell the device. Like Apple's iPhone, the gadget offers the chance for operators to boost data usage, which is more profitable than voice revenues.
Users will be able to set up their email accounts, news sources, podcasts, audio books and blog feeds at home on their computer, and the data is then pushed to the device whenever it is updated.
McGoldrick said the company opted to use this approach -- which rules out quickly browsing the Web on the go -- because it was simpler in a mobile environment.
"I see these devices with 50 buttons on them. We have eight," he said, adding that the company plans to add a keypad to future models.
(Editing by Louise Ireland)

Monday, January 21, 2008

five top VoIP Security Threats for 2008

VoIP security solutions provider siperalogo1.gif Sipera Systems has posted their list of what their Sipera VIPER Labs sees as the five top VoIP Security Threats for 2008.

Before I offer this list, two caveats:

First, when a company with technological solutions posts their predictions, it is almost always a tacit declaration on their part that they know what is going on, and they have a solution just for you.

Second, props to Sipera on the name, VIPER Labs. I know if I was going into battle, I’d love to have poison snakes (or the binary equivalent of same) on my side.

OK here are Sipera’s five predictions:

  1. First and foremost, as enterprises deploy SIP Trunks and UC for the mobile workspace, denial of service (DoS) and distributed DoS attacks on VoIP networks will become an increasingly important issue.
  2. HTTP or other third party data services running on VoIP end-points will be exploited for eavesdropping and other attacks.
  3. The hacking community, experienced with exploiting the vulnerabilities in other Microsoft offerings, will turn its attention and tools towards Microsoft OCS – taking advantage of its UC connections to public IMs, email addresses and buddy lists to create botnets and launch attacks. As well, enterprise federation for OCS, a major productivity and business process enabler, will be a source of greater VoIP security risk since it exposes once closed networks to the risks found in other federations.
  4. Hackers will set up more IP PBXs for vishing/phishing exploits. Vishing bank accounts will accelerate, due to ease of exploit and the appeal of “easy money.”
  5. VoIP attacks against service providers will escalate, using readily available, anonymous $20 SIM cards. With UMA becoming more widely deployed, service providers are, for the first time, allowing subscribers to have direct access to mobile core networks over IP, making it easier to spoof identities and use illegal accounts to launch a variety of attacks.

Well, well. IMHO scariest of those is Sipera’s view that hackers will turn to Microsoft OCS for attacks. As enterprises deploy OCS that’s where the big targets will be.

I’m on my way to the IT Expo in Miami Beach (OK you frostbelters can be jealous and I won’t hold it against you) next week, and you can bet I will be asking lots of questions about those risks.

Crunchies Winners

[source : http://gigaom.com/2008/01/18/crunchies-winners/#more-11239]

Without further ado, the winners of this year’s Crunchies awards are:

Thank you to the sponsors of the 2007 Crunchies who are underwriting the event and making it possible to recognize outstanding contributions in our industry. Award Benefactors: Adobe, Charles River Ventures, The Founders Fund, The Mayfield Fund, Microsoft, Our Stage and Sun Microsystems. Thank you also to our Program Sponsors, including Ask, Framr (an ecommerce start-up offering custom picture framing, launching tonight), Lotus Vodka, Intel Capital, Lehman Brothers, MeeVee, RealTimeMatrix’s Vortex, Searchles, our official live-streaming partner of the night Mogulus, our official ticketing sponsor amiando, WeBreakStuff for design and MediaTemple for hosting.

Google betting big on mobile market--and Apple

Google betting big on mobile market--and Apple

http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9849352-7.html

Vic Gundotra, a vice president of engineering at Google, shows off the new user interface of Google Web apps for the iPhone being unveiled at Macworld on Monday.

(Credit: Google)

(This post has been updated to reflect Google's announcement on Monday.)

On Christmas Day thousands of people opened up boxes with something cool and functional inside and wasted no time logging onto Google.com through their brand new iPhones.

As a result of those gifts, the number of global queries to Google's search site from iPhones surpassed the number of queries from people using market-leading Symbian-based phones for the first time. Google calls it the "Christmas cross-over."

That is huge given the fact that the number of iPhone units shipped is tiny compared to the number of Symbian-based phones out there. The cross-over only lasted a few days or so, but it shows the impact the iPhone is having on the telecommunications industry and provides a glimpse into its future market potential for the Web.

"It's about usage, not just units," Vic Gundotra, vice president of mobile and developer at Google, said in a recent interview with CNET News.com. "The data proves that people are using the browser on the iPhone."

The iPhone revolutionized the industry by making it easy and affordable to use the Web on a cell phone, he says. Google is offering Web apps written for the iPhone browser that bring the PC experience to the mobile device, he says.

On Monday--the first day of Macworld--Google unveiled a new user interface for its iPhone Web apps that make Gmail, search, Reader, Calendar, Picasa and other services faster to use and more customizable. It also has optimized iGoogle for the iPhone.

Now, new e-mail messages automatically show up so you don't need to hit refresh, messages can arrive in 25 seconds or less and auto-complete makes composing an e-mail faster. Calendar offers a month-at-a-glance view that isn't yet offered on the desktop. Your favorite apps are in tabs at the top of the screen and they can be switched around.

"This app will work great on Android," Google's mobile software platform launched in November, says Gundotra.

What's next? Will more Google apps join YouTube and Google Maps on the iPhone's home screen that shows up when the device is first turned on?

Gundotra smiles mischievously.

"One thing that bothers me is that (mobile) apps don't work offline," he says when prodded.

Given that Google launched Google Gears, which allows people to work on their Web apps even when they are not connected to the Internet, last May it's likely they'll have something similar for mobile soon.

Android struggles to life

Android struggles to life

Source: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/01/15/android_demo/

New platform, old handset
By Bill Ray

Linux specialists a la Mobile has demonstrated Google's Android platform running on a mobile phone handset, an HTC Qtek 9090, and explained how a development house might make money from Android.
Getting the Android code to execute on a handset is technically challenging. Even though Boston-based a la Mobile was beaten to the demonstration by a lone hacker it's still an impressive achievement. But a la Mobile's done more than just getting Android to execute - they've also created the applications needed to make the device usable as a mobile phone.
Android might be free, but the suite of applications needed to make a phone into a phone were never part of the Android package. The expectation has been that third-party companies would spring up to supply those, but until now there has been little evidence of that.
a la Mobile was set up in 2005, and developed its own Linux-based mobile phone platform. The company reckons that by using the applications developed for that platform on Android, they can halve the time to market for an Android handset.

The question of who is going to be making that Android handset remains open. Demonstrations of the platform on three-year-old handsets are all very impressive, but without support from a major hardware manufacturer Android isn't going to be living for long. ®

Sony Ericsson sells over 100 million handsets in 2007

gr8 news for my previous company :)

source : http://www.sonyericsson.com/cws/corporate/press/pressreleases/pressreleasedetails/q42007financialpressreleases-20080116
Sony Ericsson sells over 100 million handsets in 2007

16 January 2008 Q4 Highlights:
18% increase in volume year-on-year
Continued market share gains and profitable growth
Continued investment for the future
2007 Highlights:
Over 100 million units sold – more than double global market growth rate
Margins remain strong as company shifts to broader portfolio
Unit growth underpinned by increased sales of lower priced phones
145 million music enabled phones sold to date, of which 57 million were Walkman® phones – maintaining leadership in music
The consolidated financial summary for Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB (Sony Ericsson) for the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2007 is as follows:

Mobiles linked to disturbed sleep

Mobiles linked to disturbed sleep

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7199659.stm

Mobiles linked to disturbed sleep

The evidence on mobile phone safety has been contradictory

Using a mobile phone before going to bed could stop you getting a decent night's sleep, research suggests.
The study, funded by mobile phone companies, suggests radiation from the handset can cause insomnia, headaches and confusion.
It may also cut our amount of deep sleep - interfering with the body's ability to refresh itself.
The study was carried out by Sweden's Karolinska Institute and Wayne State University in the US.


This research suggests that if you need to make a make a phone call in the evening it is much better to use a land line

Alasdair Philips
Powerwatch

Funded by the Mobile Manufacturers Forum, the scientists studied 35 men and 36 women aged between 18 and 45.
Some were exposed to radiation equivalent to that received when using a mobile phone, others were placed in the same conditions, but given only "sham" exposure.
Those exposed to radiation took longer to enter the first of the deeper stages of sleep, and spent less time in the deepest one.
The scientists concluded: "The study indicates that during laboratory exposure to 884 MHz wireless signals components of sleep believed to be important for recovery from daily wear and tear are adversely affected."
The suggestion is that radiation disrupts production of the hormone melatonin, which controls the body's internal rhythms.
Electrosensitivity
About half the people in the study believed themselves to be "electrosensitive", reporting symptoms such as headaches and impaired cognitive function from mobile phone use.
But they proved to be unable to tell if they had been exposed to the radiation in the test.
Alasdair Philips is director of Powerwatch, which researches the effects of electromagnetic fields on health.
He said: "The evidence is getting stronger that we should treat these things in a precautionary way.
"This research suggests that if you need to make a phone call in the evening it is much better to use a land line, and don't have your mobile by your bedside table."
Mike Dolan, executive director of the Mobile Operators Association, said the study was inconsistent with other research.
He said: "It is really one small piece in a very large scientific jigsaw. It is a very small effect, one researcher likened it to less than the effect you would see from a cup of coffee."
Last September a major six-year study by the UK Mobile Telecommunications and Health Research Programme (MTHRP) concluded that mobile phone use posed no short-term risk to the brain.
However, the researchers said they could not rule out the possibility that long-term use may raise the risk of cancer.

The invisible computer revolution: mobile phones in the developing world

The invisible computer revolution: mobile phones in the developing world


Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7106998.stm



If I had told you ten years ago that by the end of 2007 there would be an international network of wirelessly-connected computers throughout the developing world, you might well have said it wasn't possible.
I would probably have said the same, but as it turns out we would have been wrong: it was possible, and it was created, and it continues to expand, not through Non-Governmental Organisations or charity or development grants but through the market, with much of it financed by some of the poorest people on the planet.
I am talking, of course, about the mobile phone network.
Along with the internet, with which it is rapidly merging, this is the most astonishing technology story of our time, and one that has the power to revolutionise access to information across the developing world.
Unfortunately, rich country biases limit understanding of this amazing phenomenon: for those in North America or Western Europe the cell phone is primarily or uniquely a phone designed to make voice calls.
In the rich world, even those who use the mobile for other tasks such as e-mail almost always do so as an adjunct to their "computer" (ie, the desktop or laptop in their home or office): the mobile phone is used for those tasks only when the "computer" isn't accessible.
Revolutionise education
Because those of us based in the developed world are always thinking of computers as things with 15-inch or 17-inch or 24-inch screens, it can be hard to see the potential of something much smaller, even if it's right in our pocket.
I was talking with a software developer friend of mine recently and going on as I do about the potential for cell phone software to revolutionise education, literacy, and public health in the developing world.
And he said to me "but can you really create a valuable user experience on such a small screen and with such a slow processor". So I asked him if he'd heard of the iPhone, or the Gameboy. Neither of those devices seem to have much difficulty in creating a compelling and useful user experience, and how long do you think it will it be before there's a sub-$100 iPhone or equivalent?
The whole history of consumer electronics suggests that we won't have to wait for long.



Meanwhile, this revolution of personally-financed wirelessly-connected computers largely goes unnoticed by the international development community, and because their paradigm revolves around desktops and laptops they spend millions developing specialised laptops for schoolchildren in developing countries, which will surely only ever reach a small fraction of them, while the network of invisible computers continues its exponential penetration into those same regions, below the radar.
Of course, even in the high-growth areas of sub-Saharan Africa, the fastest growing cell phone market in the world, most people still don't have a cell phone of their own (though many have access to one via a friend or family member).
But important sub-groups in that region have much higher penetration than the general population, including knowledge workers such as teachers or healthcare providers.
The question we should be asking ourselves, then, is not "how can we buy, and support, and supply electricity for, a laptop for every schoolteacher" (much less every schoolchild), but rather "what mobile software can we write that would really add value for a schoolteacher (or student, or health worker, or businessperson) and that could run on the computer they already have in their pocket?"
Consider just one application: continuing education for clinical health workers.
Many developing country health providers get trained once, at the start of their career, and never get any additional training at all.
This is because transporting these workers to a training conference is hugely difficult in countries where roads are inadequate, or don't exist, or fuel is scarce -- and sending paper-based materials to workers is either expensive, or more likely impossible given a poorly-functioning postal mail system.
But imagine a system that lets managers at a national level, who probably do have access to the internet on a desktop computer, coordinate and transmit SMS-based continuing education messages to the computers - sorry, to the cell phones - of those health professionals. What a difference would that make to the level of up-to-date knowledge available to a clinic worker? And how would that impact the quality of care?
And what other groups might benefit from that kind of educational program? What about teachers? What about students?
Unfortunately, as of this morning a Google search for "educational software for Windows" got 41,300 results, while a search for "educational software for cell phones" got exactly 9 hits.
Banking initiatives
That doesn't mean that no one is creating innovative, useful software to run on cell phones.
In South Africa and Nigeria, for example, a variety of mobile banking initiatives have taken off and been embraced by a population that isn't going to be getting "online", in the web sense, anytime soon but who want all the advantages of cashless transactions.
And in Kenya, Sierra Leone, and Zambia, with funding from The Vodafone Group Foundation and the UN Foundation, we've successfully completed a pilot of our EpiSurveyor mobile data collection software for public health.
Based on that pilot, which dramatically increased the public health data available in those countries, the World Health Organization has adopted EpiSurveyor as the standard for mobile data collection in Africa - and we're transitioning from unconnected PDAs to wirelessly-connected phones as I write this.
Importantly, the programming staff for that EpiSurveyor software is entirely located in developing countries: India, Kenya, and South Africa.
We've done this not only because it's more cost effective, but also to promote development capacity in those countries.
After all, who is more likely to come up with innovative software based on the centrality of the cell phone, a programmer in Silicon Valley surrounded by beautiful desktops and laptops, or a programmer in Nairobi who lives in a world in which almost all contact with the network is via cellphone?
But regardless of where the developer is located, I think it's time that we recognised that for the majority of the world's population, and for the foreseeable future, the cell phone is the computer, and it will be the portal to the internet, and the communications tool, and the schoolbook, and the vaccination record, and the family album, and many other things, just as soon as someone, somewhere, sits down and writes the software that allows these functions to be performed.
Joel Selanikio is a physician and co-founder of DataDyne.org, a non-profit creating open-source software for public health and international development, including the EpiSurveyor mobile public health data collection toolkit.

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

Sony Ericsson India tops in cell users satisfaction

Indeed a pleasent news :)

Sony-Ericsson tops in cell users satisfaction

BS Reporter / Mumbai October 17, 2007
http://www.business-standard.com/common/storypage_c_online.php?leftnm=11&bKeyFlag=IN&autono=28924



Sony-Ericsson mobile phones topped the list of overall satisfaction by users in 2007, while Motorola was ranked as the 'most improved' brand on satisfaction for the last three years. However, the overall satisfaction among mobile handset users declined, according to International Data Corporation's ‘India Mobile Handset Usage and Satisfaction Study 2007’.

Motorola was in the second slot in overall satisfaction, displacing Nokia to the third place, while barring the top three vendors (Sony Ericsson, Motorola and Nokia) all other brands fared below the industry average.

According to a release issued by IDC, overall level users feel that mobile phones have become easier to use, have better voice clarity and longer battery life and thus the satisfaction on these three parameters have increased in 2007. This is in comparison with the previous two years, 2006 and 2005.

However, internal memory and entertainment features are the two parameters on which satisfaction has come down significantly.

"The mobile handsets with higher memory and good entertainment features are still priced quite high. The entry-level phones are relatively poor on these parametres contributing to decline in satisfaction scores,” IDC India Country Manager Kapil Dev Singh said.

Since higher memory and good entertainment features are the key drivers for upgrading to a new handset, the handset makers need to review the premium charged for the higher end mobiles, he added.

The study pointed out that integrated digital camera, music player and stereo FM radio are the three main features that drive users to upgrade their handsets. These features are available in mid-range and high-end handsets so far, but the common user now demands these features in the more affordable handsets.

Multimedia Messaging Service or MMS has failed to catch the fancy of the masses due to high cost of transmission over the networks and relatively cheaper alternate modes of downloading videos available through the internet. Speakerphone feature too has emerged as a driver for upgrading the current handset and can be the most 'cost effective differentiator' for low-end handsets.

"Indian mobile user is willing to spend Rs 6,900 on an average for the next handset. This price has declined in the past three years since the study was first conducted. The average price paid for the current handset by and Indian mobile user is Rs 3,700. The 'incremental spend' for the next hand has grown to Rs 3,200 indicating that the experienced users are willing to spend higher amount for purchase of their next handset," said IDC India Senior Manager Consumer Research Shailendra Gupta said.

IDC's India Mobile Handset Usage and Satisfaction Study 2007 was conducted on a sample of 4,760 mobile (GSM and CDMA) handset users in 18 cities including the four metros (Delhi, Mumbai Chennai and Kolkata).

The IDC India study indicates that a mobile handset is used for 56 minutes a day on an average for voice communication (both incoming and outgoing calls) showing an improvement of 5 minutes over 51 minutes per day a year ago.

On SMS, the second most commonly used service, usage has continued to increase in last three years. An average SMS user sends 8 messages in day, while the number of messages received is 10 per day. This is due to a number of messages from mobile service providers giving information about various downloads like ring tones, bill related information and promotional offers and contests.

Saturday, October 20, 2007

Mobile advertising:The next big thing

Mobile advertising

The next big thing
Oct 4th 2007
From The Economist print edition: http://www.economist.com/business/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9912455

Marketers hail the mobile phone as advertising's promised land
Illustration by Claudio Munoz
ADVERTISING on mobile phones is a tiny business. Last year spending on mobile ads was $871m worldwide according to Informa Telecoms & Media, a research firm, compared with $24 billion spent on internet advertising and $450 billion spent on all advertising. But marketing wizards are beginning to talk about it with the sort of hyperbole they normally reserve for products they are paid to sell. It is destined, some say, to supplant not only internet advertising, the latest fad, but also television, radio, print and billboards, the four traditional pillars of the business.

At the moment, most mobile advertising takes the form of text messages. But telecoms firms are also beginning to deliver ads to handsets alongside video clips, web pages, and music and game downloads, through mobiles that are nifty enough to permit such things. Informa forecasts that annual expenditure will reach $11.4 billion by 2011. Other analysts predict the market will be as big as $20 billion by then.

The 2.5 billion mobile phones around the world can potentially reach a much bigger audience than the planet's billion or so personal computers. The number of mobile phones in use is also growing much faster than the number of computers, especially in poorer countries. Better yet, most people carry their mobile with them everywhere—something that cannot be said of television or computers.

Yet the biggest selling point of mobile ads is what marketing types call “relevance”. Advertisers believe that about half of all traditional advertising does not reach the right audience. Less effort (and money) is wasted with online advertising: half of it is sold on a “pay-per-click” basis, which means advertisers pay only when consumers click on an ad. But mobile advertising through text messages is the most focused: if marketers use mobile firms' profiles of their customers cleverly enough, they can tailor their advertisements to match each subscriber's habits.

In September Blyk, a new mobile operator, launched a service in Britain that aims to do just that. It offers subscribers 217 free text messages and 43 free minutes of voice calls per month as long as they agree to receive six advertisements by text message every day. To sign up for the service, customers must fill out a questionnaire about their hobbies and habits. So advertisers can target their messages very precisely. “Britain is the largest, but also the trickiest European ad market, so if it works here it will work everywhere,” says Pekka Ala-Pietila, chief executive and one of the founders of Blyk.

Last year America's Virgin Mobile tried something similar with its “Sugar Mama” programme, which offers subscribers the choice between receiving an ad via text message or viewing a 45-second advertisement when browsing the internet in exchange for one free minute of talk time. Those who spend five minutes filling out a questionnaire online get five more minutes. Sugar Mama is proving popular: at the end of August Ultramercial, the company that manages the scheme, reported that Virgin Mobile had given away more than 10m free minutes.

Vodafone, a big mobile operator based in Britain, sees mobile advertising as a potentially lucrative source of additional income. For the time being, most of the ads on its network are still text messages, although it has begun displaying ads on Vodafone live!, its mobile internet homepage, through which subscribers access the internet and download videos and music. Vodafone is also running several pilots, says Richard Saggers, the head of its mobile advertising unit, in which subscribers receive free content in exchange for viewing ads. Earlier this year, subscribers in Britain were given the option of downloading footage from “Big Brother”, a reality-TV show, in exchange for viewing a promotional video clip. The firm has also offered free video games punctuated with ads to customers in Greece, and free text messages to Czech students who agree to accept ads in the same format.

Most mobile advertising strategies now rely on text messages, since few customers have taken to more elaborate services that allow them to download music, games and videos and to surf the web. Only 12% of subscribers in America and western Europe used their mobiles to access the internet at the end of 2006. Most people think mobile screens are too small for watching TV programmes or playing games, although newer models, such as Apple's iPhone, boast bigger and brighter screens.

That is not the only problem. While consumers are used to ads on television and radio, they consider their mobiles a more personal device. A flood of advertising might offend its audience, and thus undermine its own value. Tolerance of advertising also differs from one market to another. In the Middle East, for example, unsolicited text messages are quite common, and do not prompt many complaints. But subscribers might not prove so open-minded in Europe or America.

Another hitch, says Nicky Walton-Flynn of Informa, is that operators have lots of databases with information about their clients' habits that would be of great interest to advertisers. But privacy laws may prevent them from sharing it. Moreover, advertisers, operators and middlemen have not agreed a common format for this information, nor worked out how to share the revenue it might yield.

Some think these obstacles will confine mobile advertising to a niche for years to come. But others see a whole new world of possibilities, as more people use their phones to access the internet and consumers grow used to the intrusion. Mobile phones, some of which are now equipped with satellite-positioning technology (see article), could be used to alert people to the charms of stores or restaurants they are walking or driving past.

Tying ads to online searches from mobile phones is another potential goldmine. A subscriber typing in “pizza” for instance, could receive ads for nearby pizza parlours along with his generic search results. Such a customer, mobile operators hope, is likely to be more grateful than annoyed by the intrusion. What could be more relevant than that?

7 Habits of Highly Effective Managers

7 Habits of Highly Effective Managers
[source : http://foundread.com/2007/10/18/7-habits-of-highly-effective-managers/]
I listened to a Webinar today billed as a tutorial on how to excel as a product manager. The session was led by a woman named Alyssa Dver who is CEO of a startup called Wander Wear, the founder of Type @ Consulting, and author of a successful book on the topic called “Software Product Management Essentials.”

Initially, I took in the Webinar because I figured the product manager is one of the most important employees a startup has; and a founder definitely needs to be able to tell if their product manager is any good, right? But half-way through, I realized Ms. Dver’s advice is applicable to any manager, to any founder, even to any employee who wishes to be ‘highly effective.’ So, I’ve summarized and translated her ’7 Habits,’ below.

There are some very good metrics in her program that ought to help you measure and improve product management within your company (like: what percent of your product manager’s time should be spent in meetings; and in what kind of meetings) so do go to Red Canary, another great founders’ site based in Canada, and listen to the whole program.

Meanwhile, just read ‘manager’, or ‘employee’ (or ‘person’!) wherever you see the term ‘product manger’ below.

The 7 Habits of Highly Effective (Product) Managers
1) Know your limits. Great product mangers know their limits. They know their product, but they aren’t a ‘know it all.’ Don’t try to talk the technical talk or the financial talk or the marketing talk when those division heads are in the room with you. Let others present to management or to customers in their areas of expertise. Respect the various department heads. Product mangers lose their credibility very quickly by trying to speak to everything. Be OK with saying ‘I don’t know, but I’ll find the person who does know.’ In other words: have command of your expertise, but defer to those who know more than you do about other things. This conveys good judgement.

2) Listen first before speaking. Good product mangers are master communicators. They listen even better than they speak. They gather information that is important to their audience, from their audience, before they begin speaking at their audience. The audience might be a group of customers, or managers, the board, or investors, etc. Good product managers are information collectors and information vetters. But this means listening, to collect and vet, before you begin evangelizing.

3) Ask ‘Why?’ not ‘What?’ Why do you want this product feature over that one? So if I ask you, ‘do you want it red, or do you want it blue?’ You say ‘blue!’ OK, so I make it blue. But at the end of the day, I might have to change it to green because I didn’t ever ask you why you wanted it to be blue. The important information, Dver is saying, isn’t what someone wants, but their motive for wanting it— the reason why. If you know why someone wants something (e.g., a product, a term in a deal, a raise, etc.) you are more empowered to come up with a solution that will meet their real need, and in a way that works for you as well. The question ‘what do you want,’ will tell you exactly one fact. But asking ‘why do you want that’ actually gives you understanding.

4) Be decisive. Good product managers make the decision. Sometimes ‘the decision’ can mean saying: ‘I’m not ready to make a decision today, but I will make a decision by this date.’ Being decisive and not wishy washy is a key ingrediant of good product management. You will NEVER have all the information in hand that you would like. That is a fact of life. But you are always able to make the best decision you can with the info set you have at the time, this is very important. A good product manager will say ‘this is what we’re going to do.’ Then, if a key piece of information comes in later that [contravenes your decision], good product management means having the courage to say ‘OK, let’s take a look at that, and if it makes sense, we will change our position.’ This equates to confidence, which equates to credibility. Both are key attributes of great product managers.

5) Be responsive. You don’t have to answer every email or every phone call. But you should try. Ignoring people is NOT good. We know this intuitively. When someone is trying to get your attnention, it is because something is important to them. When you choose not to respond, or you choose to ignore them, they will take it personally. A lack of response says to that person ‘I’m not important to [my manager]; so [my manager] is not important to me.’ In this way, the manager loses credibility. The employee might be (unconsciously) thinking ‘if my manager can’t even answer my email, what else can’t he do?’ So when you don’t have the answer(s) to an inquiry, respond anyway with something like, ‘I plan on getting back to you I just don’t have all the information right now, but your message is important to me.’ Respond with something that makes the other person feel attended to, and important to you. Good product managers are attentive, and that means being repsonsive.

6) Communicate frequently. This is the proactive side of ‘be responsive.’ You must also communicate of your own volition, and frequently. Send out status reports. Keep information flowing so that people aren’t harassing you with questions like ‘what’s going on?’ If it helps, Refer people to earlier emails or reports you’ve issued to keep the information flow going. But also communicate concretely, and concisely. People need status reports to make them feel ‘in the loop.’ This is easily accomplished if you communicate often. Just keep it short and sweet.

7) Manage passion. Passion is great, and great product managers are very passionate people. We love our products they’re our babies (sounds like founders!). We want to tell people about them and make others love [our baby], too. But somebody who has too much passion, who doesn’t shut-up enough to listen, or who doesn’t want to hear that their baby might not be ‘perfect,’ will also lose his/her credibility quickly. You need other people’s perspectives, and criticisms. So don’t be the kind of prodcut manager who won’t stop to hear that the baby isn’t perfect. Be enthusiastic but not so overzealous that you lose track of what the mission is: To succeed. Passion motivates you to execute, but passion is not execution. And without execution there is no success.

There was much more in Ms. Dver’s Webinar, so as I said, go to Red Canary and listen to the whole thing. She concludes by listing the 3 characteristics of a successful product manager: A humble leader. A careful communicator. An avid student. Her ’7 Habits’ will go a long way toward helping you acquire them, too.

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

Google Buys Jaiku

Google Buys Jaiku
[source :http://mashable.com/2007/10/09/jaiku-google/]

Breaking: Google (GOOG) has bought Jaiku, a Finland-based mobile IM and presence company. The news just broke, where else, but on Jaiku. The terms of the deal were not disclosed.

The details of the deal are on the Jaiku blog, and the company has put up FAQ for current users. This is indeed good news for the small Jaiku team, and another piece of the Google Phone Puzzle.

Activity streams and mobile presence are important areas where we believe Google can add a lot of value for users. Jaiku’s technology and talented team are a great addition to Google’s current application and mobile teamsAt first glance, this is an excellent acquisition on the part of Google. OK, time for me to sit down and start making sense of all the Google acquisitions in the mobile and VoIP space.

Sunday, September 30, 2007

Iphone in UK and Europe: might go any way, people might make it hit or just ignore !

Apple announced the launch of iPhone in one country or other in Europe - UK with mobile carrier o2, Germany with mobile carrier T-Mobile in the last two days - and today Apple announced its launch in France with mobile carrier Orange.


Apple seems to be choosing a different carrier every time, but just one carrier in each country.

It will be interesting to watch as all these country launches will happen on Nov 9, 2007 , as Ipod touch seems to have given Iphone less craze here in UK. Lets see how Europe would react to it !!

My general view: here SonyEricsson and Nokia have very good proposition compared to Iphone. As we view its not that leap through technology, exception the UI which we all agree is way ahead.

Thursday, September 20, 2007

Xobni is cool app

First lets look at Xobni (pick for the coolest company) and what they have built.

They have an adjunct application for Microsoft Outlook, which scans through the entire email database and quickly establishes relationships among the people you email, and ranks them according to frequencies and relevance.
The best feature of this application is that it can tell you when a specific person is most likely to reply to you and how quickly. It is not discovery and presence in the purist sense, but it’s close enough. Future versions of Xobni’s software will bring together various web services — everything from Flickr photos to Twitter. I like the idea of a quick query that matches a name with a photo from Flickr or Photobucket.

(If you want to try Xobni, use invite code GigaOM — only the first 100 people are going to get the beta downloads.)

Friday, September 14, 2007

HTTP vs. POP vs. IMAP vs. Exchange

HTTP vs. POP vs. IMAP vs. Exchange

HTTP
Web-based email
Not made for access other than the web
Some HTTP accounts can be checked given the right client tool (like Outlook can check Hotmail)
POP
Not made for keeping multiple computers/devices and web in sync
Generally, mail is downloaded from the server upon checking it (unless you use a tool like Outlook which has the ability to leave it on the server)
Even if you leave messages on the server, if you delete on remote device, it will not delete on the server (unless you have a client tool like Outlook which will give you some options)
If you send from remote device, it is not pushed to a sent items folders on the server
Only brings messages down in the Inbox (not sub-folders)
No good push capability for mobile devices (as of this writing)
POP is low cost
Most personal email accounts use POP (i.e. Gmail)

IMAP
Keeps multiple computers/devices and web in sync
Mail is left on the server when checked
Inbox and sub-folders are brought down to client machine/device
Push mail available on mobile devices, but many complain of poor support
Newer than POP
Catching on among personal users who do not have Exchange
Exchange
The most robust email platform
Mail is kept on the server
Allows calendar, tasks, notes, etc. in addition to email
Allows group collaboration of calendars, etc. when used in a group environment
Excellent about keeping everything (PCs/mobile devices/web) in sync
Push email for mobile devices (Blackberry and non-Blackberry with Exchange ActiveSync)
Pretty much the standard for medium size and enterprise email/collaboration
Expensive
Gaining popularity among small businesses and personal users as it becomes more affordable
…maybe, one day, I’ll turn this into a more complete chart of features to allow for generic comparison. But I will note, that there is a different connotation, a different aura that doesn’t fit into a particular feature list about each of these. For now, I will suggest that you should use Exchange since you are a blog reader of mine and are therefore technically-savvy, business-savvy, and/or someone who copies what I do since I know what I’m doing.

Monday, September 10, 2007

Can Samsung Hold Off A Resurgent Motorola?

UPDATE: Can Samsung Hold Off A Resurgent Motorola?
[Source: http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200709100822DOWJONESDJONLINE000211_FORTUNE5.htm
]
LONDON (Dow Jones) -- None of its phones have triggered the excitement of Apple's iPhone or the mass buying of Motorola's RAZR, yet South Korea's Samsung Electronics over the summer quietly became the world's No. 2 seller of mobile phones behind Nokia Corp.
The wireless industry, momentarily thrown into a tizzy by the arrival of the iPhone, paid little attention as the Asian titan surpassed Motorola (MOT) in terms of market share.
Yet the move invites an important question: Was it a fluke, or does Samsung have what it takes to hold off a resurgent Motorola in the longer term?
The U.S. vendor's woes over the last quarters -- from the lack of a convincing successor to the RAZR to a somewhat haphazard strategy and inventory gluts-- no doubt played an important part in Samsung's surge ahead.
Yet the group's (SSNGY) ascent can't be dismissed solely as the result of its nearest competitor's mistakes. Industry observers say it may be sowing the seeds of a longer-lived domination.
Samsung, which has built a reputation for churning out attractive phones quickly, but is sometimes criticized for copying its competitors' designs, is skillfully tweaking its strategy.
In the last two quarters, it has departed slightly from an exclusive focus on the high end to launch less sophisticated models aimed at helping it gain share in the mid-market, where its ever-thinner phones hold great appeal. It's also looking to new territory, with plans to expand into the entry-level segment.
"Samsung is marketing and pricing aggressively to expand its entry-tier product line and to take share from a downbeat Motorola in mid- and higher- tiers," said Neil Mawston, associate director in the global wireless practice of research firm Strategy Analytics.
Those tactics are clearly paying off. It had 15% of the global market in the second quarter compared to 14% for Motorola and 39% for Nokia (NOK) , according to Strategy Analytics.
Motorola: the comeback kid?
Despite two restructuring initiatives announced so far this year and a management shakeup within the mobile-devices unit, industry observers don't expect a recovery anytime soon at Motorola.
"I don't see their situation improving for the next two quarters at least," said Shaleindra Pandey, a telecoms analyst at ABI Research. "They're going to need to come up with something better than yet another RAZR."
Motorola's shares have fallen 29% over the past 12 months. Samsung shares have lost 13% over the same period.
A strategy presentation last Friday did little to reassure investors that the company has gotten its magic back.
Richard Windsor, an analyst with Nomura International, said he believes just stabilizing the business will be much harder than management suggests.
"We think the difficulties that the mobile devices division faces have been underplayed," Windsor said, adding that big market share gains are unlikely in the short term.
Blaine Carroll, an analyst for FTN Midwest, is similarly cautious. He said in a note last month that he expects Motorola to continue to lose market share in the third quarter to the four other major vendors -- Nokia, Samsung, Sony Ericsson (SNE) (ERICY) and LG. He also said handset estimates could be revised lower in the fourth quarter.
Credit Suisse analysts were even more pessimistic, cautioning in a note last week that Motorola is likely to remain on the back foot until the second half of 2008. In Western Europe, where Motorola has a historically weaker position, particularly relative to Nokia, the recovery could take even longer, they warned, because of the need to introduce brand new lines.
The Credit Suisse analysts said that while they believe Motorola will eventually return to being a robust player, the recovery will only happen once it has stopped oozing market share, revamped its portfolio, particularly in 3G, and is achieving operating margins close to double-digits again.
Geoff Blaber, a senior analyst at research firm CCS Insight, explained that Motorola's product roadmap in the mid-range and high-end segments was substantially affected by software problems when the company transitioned its software from a proprietary platform to a Java Linux system. As a result, the vendor wasn't able to develop new handsets as quickly as its competitors.
"It is crucial for Motorola to demonstrate that they're over these software problems and that the new Linux-Java platform is up and running," he said.
"Then we need them to start rolling out new products much more often, particularly in 3G," he added.
For now, unfortunately, there seems to be little enthusiasm for Motorola's latest products.
Initial sales of the RIZR Z8, a new high-end "kick slider" device, appear to have gotten off to a slow start, Oppenheimer analysts told clients at the end of July. According to Mobile Today's Mobile Tracker service in the U.K., the RIZR Z8 ranked as the twentieth best-selling contract handset in the weeks ending July 20 and July 27. It then dropped even further down.
"The Z8 'media monster' hasn't really shaken people up," said Carolina Milanesi, research director in the mobile and consumer device practice of Gartner.
"They made a big splash at the 3GSM telecoms trade show because of the ergonomics, but it doesn't have any must-have feature. And it's still focused on video, which is a hard sell," she said.
During the summer Motorola also introduced the W series, targeted at the mass market, and its new RAZR, simply called the RAZR2, which many analysts said may have been the first mistake.
"If you're going to upgrade from your current phone, you want the new phone to sound like something new and exciting," Milanesi said.
She added that while many consumers were persuaded to buy the original RAZR because of its hot looks and despite its poor functionality, they may not show the same enthusiasm for the RAZR2 in the absence of a similar design edge.
Motorola management itself concedes the company will need more than a new bestseller to turn its fortunes around. In an investor presentation last week, Chief Financial Officer Tom Meredith said that while a new hit product would be great, it's not absolutely necessary for the company to return to profitability or regain market share. What the group really needs, he said is to be "boringly consistent" and improve its cost structure.
Samsung
So it looks as though Samsung will get another few quarters to endear itself to consumers and operators.
"They're in a very, very strong position at the moment," said CCS Insight's Blaber. "I would expect them to maintain their No. 2 position in the next few months at least," he added.
Devices such as the ultra thin U600 are doing extremely well in several European markets, and the U.K. in particular. Samsung is also introducing a new phone equipped with a 5 megapixel camera, albeit at a much lower price than rival models from the likes of Sony Ericsson and LG.
Blaber said the device is likely to gain a lot of attention and exemplifies Samsung's strategy of using "halo" products to attract new customers.
The Korean maker is able to offer the phone at a cut-throat price because it's only 2.5G, Blaber said. The vendor's strong manufacturing capabilities and vertically integrated business model, with many of the components produced in- house, are another bonus.
But despite all its recent success, Samsung is not without weaknesses.
The most blatant one until recently, according to some industry observers, has been a lack of true design innovation, with the company relying instead on its ability to quickly imitate what worked for its competitors. For instance, shortly after Nokia launched its L'Amour collection of phones in soft colors targeted at women, Samsung debuted its La Fleur range, using similar hues and flowery prints.
"They're happy to just basically copy what's working for the other vendors," said Gartner's Milanesi.
She is also concerned about the lack of a clear long-term strategy, stressing that the vendor only seem to be focused on getting thinner at the moment.
Blaber, however, pointed out that Samsung's designs are becoming more and more revolutionary with models such as the "flipper" F300, with one side for playing music and videos and the other featuring a regular phone and keypad.
With the help of such attraction-grabbing phones, Credit Suisse analysts expect Samsung's market share to continue to increase.
"Recent market share data show that Samsung is well on track with its expansion strategy as it benefited from Motorola's loss, especially in China, with a handsome contribution from the low-end segment," the broker said. (END) Dow Jones Newswires
09-10-07 0822ET
Copyright (c) 2007 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

In Europe, They Like Their VoIP





In Europe, They Like Their VoIP

Voice over Internet Protocol is a fast-growing business in the United States, but it’s growing even faster in Europe, and its traction in the old world is only going to increase. With competitive broadband service providers (such as France’s Free and Talk Talk in the UK) offering flat-rate voice plans over their high-speed pipes and wireless carriers embracing triple-play offerings, Europe is poised to emerge as one of the regions where VoIP has a major impact.
According to market research firm Telegeography, consumer VoIP subscribers in Europe will reach 40 percent market penetration by 2011. That’s compared with the U.S., where total VoIP market penetration is forecast to top just 20 percent by the same year.



One of the main reasons for this is divergence: U.S. telecom incumbents AT&T (T) and Verizon (VZ) have more or less stayed out of the VoIP game, leaving the big push to come from cable operators such as Comcast (CMCSA) and Time Warner Cable (TWC). In the meantime, the independent voice service providers Vonage (VG) and SunRocket have fallen on hard times. Taken together, there were just 11.8 million VoIP subscribers in the U.S. at the end of the second quarter.
Conversely, the European incumbents — Britain’s BT Group (BT), France Telecom (FTE) and Deutsche Telekom (DT) of Germany — have responded to pressure from upstarts like Free, who have easier access to local loops, by becoming more active in their respective markets. And of course there’s Skype, which is extremely popular in Europe.
VoIP in Europe is also getting a boost from tiny tots such as Truphone, Fring, Jajah, Rebtel, Cellity — an ever-growing army of startups that is looking to lower the costs of making calls over wireless networks across Europe. The popularity of Wi-Fi enabled mobile phones is only going to accelerate the growth of VoIP on the old continent that much more.